sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86
- From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: sm-admin AT lists.ibiblio.org, SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86
- Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 14:52:57 -0800
> voting needs to be done more efficiently than this. It would be easier to
> votes as individuals (maybe in a seperate vote-only thread). The current
> way
> means if two people forward/reply to the same message at the same time then
> one persons vote will have to be manually added to the total . If five
> people
> all forward /reply to the same message it starts to get very messy.
>
> Instead of having to figure out where each new email fits in the chain of
> voting, each email should only list that one persons vote. Then votes can
> be
> added easily and no votes can be lost.
Is there a way to extend the poll feature on the website to work only
for certain registered users? Perhaps we could get bugzilla's voting
system to help us and we could make quasi bugs to vote on? Or just post
responses to the bugs instead. The only problem is people having multiple
bugzilla accounts, but I think we could deal with that.
--
________________________________________________________________________
|Andrew D. Stitt | astitt AT sourcemage.org |
|irc: afrayedknot | afrayedknot AT t.armory.com |
|aim: thefrayedknot or iteratorplusplus | |
|Grimoire Guru ham/smgl, Porting Team Lead | ftp://t.armory.com |
|Author and Maintainer of Prometheus | |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Eric Schabell, 02/20/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Eric Sandall, 02/20/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Hamish Greig, 02/20/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Casey Harkins, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Casey Harkins, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Hamish Greig, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Andrew, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Hamish Greig, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Eric Schabell, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Hamish Greig, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Andrew, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Hamish Greig, 02/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Casey Harkins, 02/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Hamish Greig, 02/20/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Eric Sandall, 02/20/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Eric Schabell, 02/20/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Casey Harkins, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Paul, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Casey Harkins, 02/22/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Arwed von Merkatz, 02/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Eric Schabell, 02/19/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Jose Bernardo Silva, 02/19/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.