sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Jose Bernardo Silva" <jbs AT bandos.homelinux.com>
- To: Eric Schabell <eschabell AT sourcemage.org>, SourceMage GNU/Linux Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Cc: sm-discuss-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 19:36:59 +0000
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 20:22:37 +0100, Eric Schabell wrote
> You know the nice thing about our distro, is that we can offer this
> spell in z-rejected! ;-)
>
> License warning and all, leaving it up to users what they do with it.
>
> Thoughts?
I have become rather dependent on xfree-devel - it supports my SiS card much
better than xfree86 4.3. But I have came to loathe all rumblings that have
came of last from the xfree "consortium". If there was a stable alternative,
I'd say to drop it. Since there isn't (yet), maybe the best is to put the
newer versions in z-rejected (maybe as xnonfree?). But we will soon have to
take into consideration the changes in the apache license too...
---
Jose Bernardo B R Silva | Source Mage GNU/Linux Section Guru
jbernardo AT sourcemage.org | http://www.sourcemage.org
http://counter.li.org #245602
http://cosmos.oninetspeed.pt/jose.bernardo
jbs AT bandos.homelinux.com
-
Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Andrew, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Hamish Greig, 02/24/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Casey Harkins, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Paul, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Casey Harkins, 02/22/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Arwed von Merkatz, 02/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Eric Schabell, 02/19/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Jose Bernardo Silva, 02/19/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Casey Harkins, 02/19/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.