Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Paul <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
  • To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86
  • Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 07:51:06 -0500

I have no opinion until I have read a proper summary of the changes.
Currently, I don't see what the fuss is about with a source based
distribution.

On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 07:12, Casey Harkins wrote:
> True, but none so far have spoken against it.
>
> -casey
>
> On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Hamish Greig wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:33, Casey Harkins wrote:
> > > As Schabell pointed out, there seems to be a consensus here to reject
> > > the
> > > new license. So the current xfree86 and xfree86-devel spells should be
> > > frozen at their current versions. Perhaps there should be a news item
> > > posted on the website indicating the decision?
> >
> > not sure I understand how only 8 or 9 peoples opinions are considered a
> > consensus ?
> >
> > Hamish
> >
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
--
De mortuis nihil nisi bonum.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page