sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Paul <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86
- Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 07:51:06 -0500
I have no opinion until I have read a proper summary of the changes.
Currently, I don't see what the fuss is about with a source based
distribution.
On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 07:12, Casey Harkins wrote:
> True, but none so far have spoken against it.
>
> -casey
>
> On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Hamish Greig wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:33, Casey Harkins wrote:
> > > As Schabell pointed out, there seems to be a consensus here to reject
> > > the
> > > new license. So the current xfree86 and xfree86-devel spells should be
> > > frozen at their current versions. Perhaps there should be a news item
> > > posted on the website indicating the decision?
> >
> > not sure I understand how only 8 or 9 peoples opinions are considered a
> > consensus ?
> >
> > Hamish
> >
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
--
De mortuis nihil nisi bonum.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Casey Harkins, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Casey Harkins, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Hamish Greig, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Andrew, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Hamish Greig, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Eric Schabell, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Hamish Greig, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Andrew, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Admin] Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Hamish Greig, 02/24/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Casey Harkins, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Casey Harkins, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Paul, 02/21/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Casey Harkins, 02/22/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Arwed von Merkatz, 02/21/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86,
Eric Schabell, 02/19/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Jose Bernardo Silva, 02/19/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] license of xfree86, Casey Harkins, 02/19/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.