sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Unet <unet AT sourcemage.org>
- To: Eric Schabell <eschabell AT sourcemage.org>, sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:09:51 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
<quote: Eric Schabell on: Friday 30 January 2004 08:58>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 03:36:18PM -0800, Eric Sandall wrote:
> > Quoting Duane Malcolm <d.malcolm AT auckland.ac.nz>:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I like the QUICK FIXES flag in the bug list, but I still need
> > > permission or need to notify the section guru that you would like to
> > > fix it. This can take a while via email. Can we have a flag like QUICK
> > > FIX ANYONE, which allows anyone to fix the bug without permission or
> > > notification?
> > >
> > > Cheers, Duane.
> >
> > You don't need permission to fix bugs that have not been looked at, only
> > to muck around updating things or moveing them around.
>
> Exactly, as is often repeated here, anyone with an account may accept a
> bug. If you don't want to do that, you may always comment on a bug. If
> you have a fix, attache the comments or a file containing the patch, no
> one will complain, just a few of us leads will dance a jig (joy!)!
>
I have a little note to add: if the bug is in a section maintained by someone
*known* active (eg alley_cat, lace, me, etc...), I would prefer at least to
get a warning or a question about the status of the bug. Sometlmes, a bug is
(for me) an occasion of reworking a spell...
Just my 0,02$/£/E
- --
Unet - PPC Iso maker
Grimoire Guru for Audio
{unet|audio} AT sourcemage.org
Sourcemage GNU/Linux -
Bring magic into your linux!
www.sourcemage.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAGhFSgwFeBS+cPfMRAjIzAJ0SjSQmx5buO7mKxGJr/Uc0vEw+WgCeK2Hx
Vp7FD1+RwCYlSnGp/oaKy/M=
=Swic
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
[SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Jeremy Kolb, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Hamish Greig, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Jeremy Kolb, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Eric Sandall, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Hamish Greig, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Duane Malcolm, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Eric Sandall, 01/29/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency, Jason Flatt, 01/30/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency, Eric Schabell, 01/30/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency, Unet, 01/30/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Eric Sandall, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Duane Malcolm, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Hamish Greig, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Eric Sandall, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Jeremy Kolb, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Hamish Greig, 01/29/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.