Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency
  • Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 03:34:16 +1100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 03:30, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Quoting Jeremy Kolb <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>:
> > I appreciate the hard work that is put into this and all of the
> > wonderful people that do it, and I can understand why unconfirmed bug
> > reports shouldn't be dealt with until there is more information. My
> > main concern is that some didn't appear to be looked at and that was
> > worrying me as I was wondering if they just slipped by the maintainers
> > which would not be good. Anyways, I appreciate everyone involved and I
> > did not know before hand about the priorities (such as the 2.6 headers).
>
> We're always accepting volunteers to help out. :) Some of our gurus are
> quite busy in RL, though it doesn't take long to at least post, "Looking at
> it", but there's no requirement to do that.
>
> A few of our developers (such as myself) use 2.6, so some of the 2.6 bugs
> are being fixed (mainly thanks to Hamish's hard work). So just be patient
> and we may be the first distro to officially support 2.6. ;)
>
> -sandalle

Arwed actually started the work I just got lucky in my random removal of
*stuff* from the headers.
Hamish
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAGTYV8fSufZR6424RAuUEAJ9FkQXRrmHIQrhmu56lcnXfWb5CJQCaArqD
EEsuQhlNvptonSVSbkI1I9I=
=pKJe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page