sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jeremy Kolb <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>
- To: Hamish Greig <hgreig AT bigpond.net.au>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 01:01:48 -0500
I appreciate the hard work that is put into this and all of the
wonderful people that do it, and I can understand why unconfirmed bug
reports shouldn't be dealt with until there is more information. My
main concern is that some didn't appear to be looked at and that was
worrying me as I was wondering if they just slipped by the maintainers
which would not be good. Anyways, I appreciate everyone involved and I
did not know before hand about the priorities (such as the 2.6 headers).
-
[SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Jeremy Kolb, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Hamish Greig, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Jeremy Kolb, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Eric Sandall, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Hamish Greig, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Duane Malcolm, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Eric Sandall, 01/29/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency, Jason Flatt, 01/30/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency, Eric Schabell, 01/30/2004
- Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency, Unet, 01/30/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Eric Sandall, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Duane Malcolm, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Hamish Greig, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Eric Sandall, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Jeremy Kolb, 01/29/2004
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] large bug closure latency,
Hamish Greig, 01/29/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.