sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc 3.3

From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT optimaltec.com>
To: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
Cc: Source Mage - Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc 3.3
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 21:56:00 -0400

I didn't rebuild glibc, but close to a hundred of other spells of all kinds seem to be alright.

Eric Sandall wrote:

Has anyone tried gcc 3.3 yet? I have, and it seems to break glibc 2.3.2
(some 'sscanf' error), can anyone refute or validate this? I've gotten
this error on two of my machines (installed from 0.6 beta3 ISO, which has
it's own glibc/gcc problem).

[SM-Discuss] gcc 3.3, Eric Sandall, 06/14/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc 3.3, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/14/2003
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc 3.3, Jose Bernardo Silva, 06/19/2003
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc 3.3, Hamish Greig, 06/19/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc 3.3, Hamish Greig, 06/19/2003
  - Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc 3.3, Eric Sandall, 06/19/2003
    - Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc 3.3, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/19/2003
      - Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc 3.3, Arwed von Merkatz, 06/19/2003
        
        Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc 3.3, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/19/2003
        
        Re: xfce4 (WAS: Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc 3.3), Dufflebunk, 06/19/2003
        
        Re: xfce4 (WAS: Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc 3.3), Sergey A. Lipnevich, 06/19/2003
        
        Re: xfce4 (WAS: Re: [SM-Discuss] gcc 3.3), Arwed von Merkatz, 06/19/2003