sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: "Source Mage - Discuss" <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] Using devfsd
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:25:26 -0700 (PDT)
Hi all,
I was just talking to a friend whom would like to start using SMGL
(currently using Gentoo, but said that he is getting frustrated) and he
asked me why we have /dev and /devices, so I explained to him that way
back when we were all Sorcerer, /dev was for applications that still
required the old device system and /devices was for the new devfs system,
without breaking the other. He then mentioned that this method is not
needed, as `devfsd` will create the old /dev links as appropriate (i.e.
/dev/hda1 -> /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1) and that we don't
need separate directories.
What shall we do? Keep it the same, or move on to using the "new way" and
remove /devices and /dev, then use `devfsd` to create a devfs system in
/dev with the appropriate old system links? I also have heard that
FreeBSD 5.1 now supports only devfs (no old dev links at all).
Thoughts?
-sandalle
--
PGP Key Fingerprint: FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91 FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-
[SM-Discuss] Using devfsd,
Eric Sandall, 06/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Using devfsd, Arwed von Merkatz, 06/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Using devfsd, Seth Woolley, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Using devfsd,
Andrew, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Using devfsd,
Eric Sandall, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Using devfsd,
Andrew, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Using devfsd,
Duane Malcolm, 06/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Using devfsd, Andrew, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Using devfsd,
Duane Malcolm, 06/10/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Using devfsd, Bas van Gils, 06/11/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Using devfsd, John T Copeland, 06/11/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Using devfsd,
Andrew, 06/10/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Using devfsd,
Eric Sandall, 06/10/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Using devfsd, Dufflebunk, 06/10/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.