sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: julian AT openit.de (Julian v. Bock)
- To: eric AT sandall.us
- Cc: " Source Mage - Discuss" <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies
- Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 09:43:11 +0100
Hi
>>>>> "ES" == Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us> writes:
ES> I think SMGL needs to add versioned dependencies to its abilities,
ES> though this will make both sorcery and spell-writing more complex.
ES> My main reason is for spells like GNUCash (requires an older
ES> version of guile).
[...]
ES> Thoughts?
I doubt it is worth the trouble. While it might be useful for gnucash,
pango, etc., these are only a handful of spells, and implementing and
using this stuff consistently is a major effort.
It will complicate things a lot (remember the 'light dependency
system' feature of sorcerer?) and it will cause problems. sorcery and
the grimoire become slowly stable and if this goes down the road again
because we simply lack the manpower (unlike gentoo) it would suck
greatly.
Julian
-
[SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Robin Cook, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Christian Sonne, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Pierre Abbat, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Jason Flatt, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Jason Flatt, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Julian v. Bock, 01/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Eric Schabell, 01/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 01/03/2003
- Re[2]: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Mark Andrews, 01/06/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 01/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Eric Schabell, 01/03/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Dufflebunk, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Jeremy A. Kolb, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Robin Cook, 01/02/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.