sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Dufflebunk" <dufflebunk AT go-nix.ca>
- To: eric AT sandall.us, " Source Mage - Discuss" <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies
- Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 19:54:49 -0400
This has been discussed several times on this list. In a nutshell:
It would be nice.
It would be a large modification to the scripts
Versioning has no standard. ie < is not a well defined symbol w.r.t.
versions.
What to do about several versions providing /sbin/foo.
The two last problems have solutions, although perhaps not elegant ;)
However, the changes necessary to properly add it in is large enough that I
think it would be better to wait until after The Great Rewrite (coming Real
Soon Now).
--------- Original Message --------
From: eric AT sandall.us
To: Source Mage - Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies
Date: 02/01/03 15:53
>
> I think SMGL needs to add versioned dependencies to its abilities, though
> this will make both sorcery and spell-writing more complex. My main
> reason is for spells like GNUCash (requires an older version of guile).
> Many of our spells already partially support this (automake, gtk+*, etc.)
> as they install into ${SPELL}-${VERSION} directories, then create a
> symlink from ${SPELL}. We would need to remove this symlink option and
> add (probably to the configure) the location of the versioned libraries
> the spell requires.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -One of Four
> a.k.a. sandalle
>
> --
> PGP Key 0x5C8D199A5A317214
> http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5A317214
>
> Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
> eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
> http://www.sandall.us/~sandalle/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
> http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
>
>
>
>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Robin Cook, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Christian Sonne, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Pierre Abbat, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Jason Flatt, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Jason Flatt, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Julian v. Bock, 01/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Eric Schabell, 01/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 01/03/2003
- Re[2]: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Mark Andrews, 01/06/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 01/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Eric Schabell, 01/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Dufflebunk, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Jeremy A. Kolb, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Robin Cook, 01/02/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.