sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Eric Sandall" <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies
- Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 12:14:24 -0800 (PST)
Robin Cook said:
> For this to work would we need to keep several version of different
> spells around then?
>
> CuZnDragon
> Robin Cook
Yes, that's part of the complexity for spells. For example, we'd have
guile-1.6.1 and guile-1.5.0 (for gnucash), then GNUCash would have (in
it's DEPENDS):
depends gnucash >= 1.3.0 and <= 1.5.0 (or some similar output, but this
is the general idea).
I'm not sure if it's really worth it (I only know of, off the top of my
head, one spell which would benefit from this, my much exampled GNUCash.
;), so it may not even be worth the effort).
What do others think?
-One of Four
a.k.a. sandalle
--
PGP Key 0x5C8D199A5A317214
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x5A317214
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://www.sandall.us/~sandalle/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-
[SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Robin Cook, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Christian Sonne, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Pierre Abbat, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Jason Flatt, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Jason Flatt, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Julian v. Bock, 01/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Eric Schabell, 01/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 01/03/2003
- Re[2]: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Mark Andrews, 01/06/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 01/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Eric Schabell, 01/03/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Dufflebunk, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Jeremy A. Kolb, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Robin Cook, 01/02/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.