sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Pierre Abbat <phma AT webjockey.net>
- To: <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies
- Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 18:56:22 -0500
On Thursday 02 January 2003 15:14, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Robin Cook said:
> > For this to work would we need to keep several version of different
> > spells around then?
> >
> > CuZnDragon
> > Robin Cook
>
> Yes, that's part of the complexity for spells. For example, we'd have
> guile-1.6.1 and guile-1.5.0 (for gnucash), then GNUCash would have (in
> it's DEPENDS):
>
> depends gnucash >= 1.3.0 and <= 1.5.0 (or some similar output, but this
> is the general idea).
>
> I'm not sure if it's really worth it (I only know of, off the top of my
> head, one spell which would benefit from this, my much exampled GNUCash.
> ;), so it may not even be worth the effort).
>
> What do others think?
jbofi'e, which I tried to write a spell for, depends on an old version of
bison and the author doesn't have the time to update it now.
Speaking of whom, do I have to add something to my chrony spell and submit it
again?
phma
-
[SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Robin Cook, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Christian Sonne, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Pierre Abbat, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Jason Flatt, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Jason Flatt, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Julian v. Bock, 01/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Eric Schabell, 01/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 01/03/2003
- Re[2]: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Mark Andrews, 01/06/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 01/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Eric Schabell, 01/03/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Dufflebunk, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Jeremy A. Kolb, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Robin Cook, 01/02/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.