sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Christian Sonne <christian AT subigo.dk>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies
- Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 21:41:43 +0100
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 12:14:24PM -0800, Eric Sandall wrote:
> Robin Cook said:
> > For this to work would we need to keep several version of different
> > spells around then?
> >
> > CuZnDragon
> > Robin Cook
>
> Yes, that's part of the complexity for spells. For example, we'd have
> guile-1.6.1 and guile-1.5.0 (for gnucash), then GNUCash would have (in
> it's DEPENDS):
>
> depends gnucash >= 1.3.0 and <= 1.5.0 (or some similar output, but this
> is the general idea).
>
> I'm not sure if it's really worth it (I only know of, off the top of my
> head, one spell which would benefit from this, my much exampled GNUCash.
> ;), so it may not even be worth the effort).
well.. this would also help rid the problems with Xft1/2, pango etc.
other distro's (gentoo) has obviously found this tactic worth the
trouble...
--
Christian Sonne
Stud. scient. math-phys at University of Copenhagen
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GM/S/CS/O d? s: a--->? C++ UL++>$ P+ L++ E--- W++ N o@ K? w !O M-- V?
PS++(+) PE@ Y-- PGP-@ t+ 5? X++ R@ tv++ b+(++) DI+>++ D G@ e>+++++
h! r-(--) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
visit www.lifesux.dk or IRC:#lifesux AT Quakenet.org
-
[SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Robin Cook, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Christian Sonne, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Pierre Abbat, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Jason Flatt, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Jason Flatt, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Eric Sandall, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Julian v. Bock, 01/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Eric Schabell, 01/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 01/03/2003
- Re[2]: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Mark Andrews, 01/06/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Sergey A Lipnevich, 01/03/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Eric Schabell, 01/03/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Dufflebunk, 01/02/2003
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies, Jeremy A. Kolb, 01/02/2003
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Versioned dependencies,
Robin Cook, 01/02/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.