sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Nick Jennings <nkj AT namodn.com>
- To: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- Cc: Jack Bertram <jack AT jbertram.net>, sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Fonts in X and Xft2
- Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 20:36:47 -0800
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 06:48:33PM -0500, Dufflebunk wrote:
> You are probably using the static version of Opera (which you must have it
> you don't have Qt installed, but I don't know if the spell is smart enough
> to switch to dynamic if you have Qt). You won't notice any difference in
> fonts w/ a static Opera. Dito for Acro Read probably. Neither Fluxbox, nor
> aterm use fonts much. The standard system font for terminals benifits
> negligably with anti-aliasing.
> So, in short, You wouldn't see much difference. Perhaps a little in ater
> and fluxbox, but that's it.
A properly fonted x terminal is good for the heart. :)
- Nick
-
[SM-Discuss] Fonts in X and Xft2,
Jack Bertram, 12/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fonts in X and Xft2, Arwed von Merkatz, 12/10/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Fonts in X and Xft2,
Dufflebunk, 12/10/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Fonts in X and Xft2, Nick Jennings, 12/10/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.