sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: "Jeremy A. Kolb" <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>
- To: Jonathan Evraire <evraire AT tuwg.com>
- Cc: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>, <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!
- Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 22:15:43 -0500 (EST)
i've had pango 1.1.3 for about 2 weeks now and it's worked great, i don't
think it's the problem, but i'll try recompiling it.
Jeremy
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Jonathan Evraire wrote:
> Hey guys,
> had the same problem and tracked it down to pango 1.0.5 not behaving
> properly with Xft2. pango 1.1.3 doesn't have this problem though... check
> out bugs 1587 and 1649 for further help:
> http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1587
> http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1649
>
> Upgrading pango did the trick for me. One little note: bumping the
> version number to 1.1.3 isn't enough, you need to change the 2.0 in
> SOURCE_URL[0] to 2.1 (thanks again to cat in IRC!)
>
> Good luck! Hope this does it for you!
>
> Jonathan Evraire
> evraire at tuwg.com
>
>
> On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Jeremy A. Kolb wrote:
>
> > yeah it's definately a problem, i've seen a few others such as xfree86
> > refusing to recompile for me and Xft2 not finding the freetype headers but
> > oh well. this is the one annoying one though. other then this one im
> > really glad about the updates. makes me feel good to recompile everything.
> > of course as i am in finals this couldn't have come at a worse time :P
> > hehehe im working on this and will hopefully figure SOMETHING out. i do
> > know that the default xterm works though so i can always use that. the
> > error might have something to do with bonobo-activation/libbonobo im also
> > getting errors with gnome-smproxy (dunno what that does). it's weird.
> >
> > Jeremy
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Eric Sandall wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Myself and at least one other person (don't remember who atm) have this
> > > problem as well, though my GNOME 2 has _never_ worked (though I only
> > > just
> > > started trying it a few weeks ago...).
> > >
> > > I have the same error, don't know about the others. I thought it was
> > > just
> > > me being stupid, so I haven't put in a bug report for it, since other
> > > seem
> > > to have it working. Also, getting everything to compile was fun (well,
> > > not really, I'm being sarcastic), which lead to quite a few bugs being
> > > created. :)
> > >
> > > -One of Four
> > > a.k.a. sandalle
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> >
> >
> >
>
>
-
[SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!,
Jeremy A. Kolb, 12/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!,
Eric Sandall, 12/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!,
Jeremy A. Kolb, 12/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!,
Jonathan Evraire, 12/03/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!, Jeremy A. Kolb, 12/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!,
Duane Macolm, 12/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!,
Jeremy Kolb, 12/04/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!, Eric Sandall, 12/04/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!, Jeremy Kolb, 12/04/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!,
Jeremy Kolb, 12/04/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!,
Jonathan Evraire, 12/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!,
Jeremy A. Kolb, 12/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!,
Eric Sandall, 12/03/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.