sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Jonathan Evraire <evraire AT tuwg.com>
- To: "Jeremy A. Kolb" <jkolb AT brandeis.edu>
- Cc: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>, <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!
- Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 03:28:52 +0000 (UTC)
Hey guys,
had the same problem and tracked it down to pango 1.0.5 not behaving
properly with Xft2. pango 1.1.3 doesn't have this problem though... check
out bugs 1587 and 1649 for further help:
http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1587
http://bugs.sourcemage.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1649
Upgrading pango did the trick for me. One little note: bumping the
version number to 1.1.3 isn't enough, you need to change the 2.0 in
SOURCE_URL[0] to 2.1 (thanks again to cat in IRC!)
Good luck! Hope this does it for you!
Jonathan Evraire
evraire at tuwg.com
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Jeremy A. Kolb wrote:
> yeah it's definately a problem, i've seen a few others such as xfree86
> refusing to recompile for me and Xft2 not finding the freetype headers but
> oh well. this is the one annoying one though. other then this one im
> really glad about the updates. makes me feel good to recompile everything.
> of course as i am in finals this couldn't have come at a worse time :P
> hehehe im working on this and will hopefully figure SOMETHING out. i do
> know that the default xterm works though so i can always use that. the
> error might have something to do with bonobo-activation/libbonobo im also
> getting errors with gnome-smproxy (dunno what that does). it's weird.
>
> Jeremy
>
>
> On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Eric Sandall wrote:
>
> >
> > Myself and at least one other person (don't remember who atm) have this
> > problem as well, though my GNOME 2 has _never_ worked (though I only just
> > started trying it a few weeks ago...).
> >
> > I have the same error, don't know about the others. I thought it was just
> > me being stupid, so I haven't put in a bug report for it, since other seem
> > to have it working. Also, getting everything to compile was fun (well,
> > not really, I'm being sarcastic), which lead to quite a few bugs being
> > created. :)
> >
> > -One of Four
> > a.k.a. sandalle
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
>
>
>
-
[SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!,
Jeremy A. Kolb, 12/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!,
Eric Sandall, 12/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!,
Jeremy A. Kolb, 12/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!,
Jonathan Evraire, 12/03/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!, Jeremy A. Kolb, 12/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!,
Duane Macolm, 12/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!,
Jeremy Kolb, 12/04/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!, Eric Sandall, 12/04/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!, Jeremy Kolb, 12/04/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!,
Jeremy Kolb, 12/04/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!,
Jonathan Evraire, 12/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!,
Jeremy A. Kolb, 12/03/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] gnome2 is broken now!,
Eric Sandall, 12/03/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.