sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Duane Macolm <d.malcolm AT auckland.ac.nz>
- To: Mads Laursen <dossen+sgl AT daimi.au.dk>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2
- Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 09:51:46 +1300
Mozilla to compiled with -march=pentium4 -O0
Xscreensaver to compiled with -march=pentium4 -O1
Haven't installed Emacs.
Mads Laursen wrote:
On 27/11/02 19.53, bluebird AT optushome.com.au wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 10:23:45PM -0800, Eric Sandall wrote:Perhaps it would be better to fix the CFLAGS, to not include -O3 for
Duane Macolm said:This sounds like an easy fix, I'll do it over the weekend
So there should be no problem if I set my architecture to i686 for allThere is an advantage: pentium4 will add -msse -msse2 -mmmx to your
compilations. I guess what I am asking is is there any advantage setting
the achitecture to pentiumIV over i686 and if so is it worth the
hassel?
I may try this out with a fresh install on another partition.
Cheers for that tip.
Duane
compilation settings, whereas i686 will only add -mmmx (IIRC). Also, I
believe that only xfree86 fails to compile with pentium4 (that's all I've
noticed so far), so probably just change to i686 for the xfree86
compilation, then set it back afterwards.
Perhaps this should be fixed in the xfree86 spell? if -march=pentium4,
then sedit it to pentium3? I believe pentium3 compiles fine with xfree86,
so you could even put that instead of i686.
-One of Four
a.k.a. sandalle
pentium4. That has worked in several cases for me.
And since this is under discussion, have any other pentium4 users had
trouble with mozilla and emacs (only the x part suffers, strangely)?
(Both work with s/-O3//)
/dossen
_______________________________________________
SM-Discuss mailing list
SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2,
Eric Sandall, 11/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2,
Julian v. Bock, 11/25/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2, Eric Sandall, 11/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2,
Eric Sandall, 11/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2,
Duane Macolm, 11/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2,
Eric Sandall, 11/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2,
bluebird, 11/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2, Mads Laursen, 11/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2, bluebird, 11/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2, Eric Sandall, 11/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2, Duane Macolm, 11/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2, Mads Laursen, 11/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2, Dufflebunk, 11/28/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2,
bluebird, 11/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2,
Eric Sandall, 11/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2,
Duane Macolm, 11/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2,
Julian v. Bock, 11/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2,
Eric Sandall, 11/25/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.