sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Dufflebunk <dufflebunk AT dufflebunk.homeip.net>
- To: Mads Laursen <dossen+sgl AT daimi.au.dk>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2
- Date: 28 Nov 2002 15:00:08 -0500
Instead of using sed, there is simple regex stuff built into bash w/ the
${parameter//pattern/string} syntax:
CFLAGS=${CFLAGS//-O3/} or
CFLAGS=${CFLAGS//-march=pentium4/-march=pentium3}
It's less expensive than an echo | sed ;)
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 20:54, Mads Laursen wrote:
> On 28/11/02 09.51, Duane Macolm wrote:
> > Mozilla to compiled with -march=pentium4 -O0
> > Xscreensaver to compiled with -march=pentium4 -O1
> I can also confirm Xscreensaver (although I did it without -O, rather
> than with -O1), it needs lower optimizations.
>
> [snip]
>
> I guess the spells need something like this (from my mozilla[1]):
>
> case $ARCHITECTURE in
> pentium4) CFLAGS="$( echo $CFLAGS | sed s/-O3// )"
> CXXFLAGS="$( echo $CXXFLAGS | sed s/-O3// )"
> ;;
> *) ;;
> esac
>
> Or is this issue big enough to justify a general way of doing this?
>
> So far there are 4 spells with this issue.
>
> Maybe a small function to be called like this:
>
> sedit_opts pentium4 s/-O3//
>
> Technically it is a feature, but it needs to be in either spells or
> sorcery, and sorcery (some lib of cause) means having only one
> instance of the code.
>
> [1] And speaking of features, could that nice little function from
> mozillas[2] CONFIGURE script, configure_set_bool, not also be moved to
> a library? It's nice, abstracted and well tested (been there a while,
> and I know I've played a lot with my mozilla without it causing trouble).
>
> [2] I was playing around with the 1.2 release[3] since you didn't ask.
> Just wish the mozilla people would upload sources faster, I've been
> playing with the cvs[4] stuff, and some things are just wierd.
>
> [3] Except for svg support and calendar (both of which lacked some
> files, due to me using a cvs pull), all apears well, and MathML seems
> to work with XFT2 now.
>
> [4] Mozilla cvs is wierd, modules and makefiles and stuff, and just
> doing like they tell you to does not give you all that you need.
>
> /dossen
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
--
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
-----------------
PGP public key at
http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3327A9A5
F1
F1
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2, Eric Sandall, 11/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2,
Eric Sandall, 11/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2,
Duane Macolm, 11/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2,
Eric Sandall, 11/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2,
bluebird, 11/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2, Mads Laursen, 11/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2, bluebird, 11/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2, Eric Sandall, 11/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2, Duane Macolm, 11/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2, Mads Laursen, 11/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2, Dufflebunk, 11/28/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2,
bluebird, 11/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2,
Eric Sandall, 11/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Compiling xfree86 with gcc2,
Duane Macolm, 11/26/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.