Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Adam Clark <adamsgl AT dhbit.ca>]

Hey, no worries.  I don't think anyone would be the least bit offended.  I
certainly wasn't.  =)

On Mon, 18 Nov 2002 23:50:14 -0500
Jeremy Kolb <jkolb AT brandeis.edu> wrote:

> oops, i didn't mean it like that! i agree that a spell should not 
> requite user intervention, what i was wondering was why there's still so 
> many problems with this upgrade when all i had to do to my box (and 
> every box is different, that's one thing i've found when using 
> sourcemage) was an ldconfig. i'm interested to know why this worked in 
> my case and not in others. i didn't mean to offend anyone by it, 
> sometimes the connection between my brain and my mouth (or in this case 
> my fingertips) has a few bugs in it! sorry if it sounded that way!
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> Adam Clark wrote:
> 
> >As Dufflebunk has also just said, that's totally inappropriate - a spell
> >should not require user intervention for a successful cast.
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss


-- 
Adam Clark, Chat Section Maintainer, ISO Forger
Grimoire Gurus Cardholding Member
a.k.a. Kinetix on #sourcemage, #grimoire-gurus
http://grimoire-gurus.org

Attachment: pgpIZmenmlTW9.pgp
Description: PGP signature