Developer Only Discussion List

[Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>]

<snip>
It was mentioned that we hold back 1.0, but not enough voices cried out for it
so it didn't seem to have much backing.

I think a developer voting system would be good, while user opinions are 
wanted
I'm not sure we want to tally their votes as well and I'd rather not do a
weighting system (i.e. developer vote = vote value * 2).

For Apache-style voting system: +1
For holding back 1.0: +1
For Hamish leaving: -1  ;)
For smaller meetings: +1
For more team meetings: +1

I would like 1.0 to be a great experience, rather then "Yeah, it worked, and I
have a system running, but ...".

-sandalle

-- 
PGP Key Fingerprint:  FCFF 26A1 BE21 08F4 BB91  FAED 1D7B 7D74 A8EF DD61
http://search.keyserver.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA8EFDD61

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/E/IT$ d-- s++:+>: a-- C++(+++) BL++++VIS>$ P+(++) L+++ E-(---) W++ N+@ o?
K? w++++>-- O M-@ V-- PS+(+++) PE(-) Y++(+) PGP++(+) t+() 5++ X(+) R+(++)
tv(--)b++(+++) DI+@ D++(+++) G>+++ e>+++ h---(++) r++ y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Eric Sandall                     |  Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us                  |  http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/          |  SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/  #196285  |  http://www.shock.wsu.edu/

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.