Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

permaculture - Re: [permaculture] Biochar

permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: permaculture

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Michael Pilarski <friendsofthetrees@yahoo.com>
  • To: permaculture <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [permaculture] Biochar
  • Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:28:26 -0800 (PST)

A piece of charcoal in the soil is carbon that is sequestered for hundreds or
thousands of years.  To give you an idea how stable charcoal is, ponder that
carbon dating techniques of archeology are based on measuring carbon isotopes
in charcoal from ancient sites.

More importantly, think of each piece of biochar as a giant apartment house
for soil microbes.,  A place to sleep, eat, rest, procreate and evade large
predators.  Each piece of biochar is a great place for cation exchange
activitity and many soil nutrients are adfixed to the biochar.  They are a
sink for soil nutrients. Each apartment house is occupied by an endless
stream of tenants for hundreds or thousands of years.

They also hold moisture and add texture and porosity to soil.

this all adds up to increased soil life, increased crop yields, increased
biomass.

All in all, a pretty good thing to have in your soil.  Multiply the
beneficial affect on arable soils worldwide and we have one of the techniques
that can help us build an exhuberant biosphere. 

Only one technique out of many, but let's use it where appropriate. 

I highly recommend research, experimentation and an open mind.

Michael pilarski

--- On Wed, 11/16/11, Toby Hemenway <toby@patternliteracy.com> wrote:

From: Toby Hemenway <toby@patternliteracy.com>
Subject: Re: [permaculture] Biochar is part of a LOCAL solution
To: "permaculture" <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>
Date: Wednesday, November 16, 2011, 8:50 PM

On Nov 16, 2011, at 3:33 PM, John D'hondt wrote:

>
> I like this but still think that charcoal burning is detrimental if we want
> to stop climate change. We produce 20 times more CO2 while making charcoal
> than we ever sequester whatever system we use.

I was just at a biochar workshop this weekend and the numbers given were that
the method we used can sequester 40% of the carbon in a given piece of wood,
and that's more than if microbes ate it, and far better than the "20x" that
you state. Does your number come from an actual calculation? The numbers I've
seen suggest that a clean pyrolysis is carbon neutral or even negative by
weight, since putting pure carbon in the soil means that nearly 3 times that
weight (the weight of one carbon plus two oxygens) is kept out of the
atmosphere. (that strikes me as a funny way to calculate it, but that's how
they do it for CO2)

I think the jury is still out on biochar in temperate climates, but replacing
inefficient open fires or wood stoves with biochar pyrolysis makes a huge
amount of sense, since you get a much cleaner burn (reduced pollution), more
efficient generation of heat for cooking, and a useable product in the
charcoal, instead of ash. So for cultures that rely on wood, it's very smart.

Toby
http://patternliteracy.com

_______________________________________________
permaculture mailing list
permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
Subscribe, unsubscribe, change your user configuration or find out more about
this list here:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/permaculture
Garden Hand Tool Sourcelist and Biointensive Gardening Guide
http://www.ibiblio.org/ecolandtech/documents/gardening-hand-tools.faq
permaculture forums http://www.permies.com/permaculture-forums
Market Farming Mailing List
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/marketfarming





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page