permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: permaculture
List archive
- From: jamesdavid Sneed <harvestcircle@hotmail.com>
- To: <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [permaculture] hierarchies and networks
- Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:03:14 -0700
Both your messages are important things to consider. I suspect that if a
standard of organization is implemented for permaculture it will be a sign
that it has become an "ism" instead of a way of living. The ism tends to
become a creature unto itself, and the original goals can suffer as a result.
> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:25:26 -0400
> From: lflj@bellsouth.net
> To: permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
> Subject: Re: [permaculture] hierarchies and networks
>
> On 10/31/2010 5:54 PM, Toby Hemenway wrote:
> > One subject we touched on in the recent certification thread was new and
> > old tools for change, and the difference
> > between hierarchical and decentralized organizations and tools. I'd said
> > that I once had high hopes for decentralized
> > leadership tools, like consensus, but was disappointed by how rarely they
> > live up to their promise. I've been
> > skeptical of the value of these and similar methods to actually produce
> > change, and have found the older
> > tools--strong leadership, old-style voting--at least as effective (though
> > I still prefer inclusive versions of these
> > tools to exclusive).
>
> They say that the world is run by those who show up.
> And, freedom of the press belong to those who own one.
>
> However, these thoughts have been circulating lately: a permaculture
> heirarchical oversight organization
> that offers, like a governmental agencies that have no teeth and only can
> offer recommendations at best to
> those who do have the power to put laws, rule and regulations in place.
>
> You vote with your feet. Permaculture teachers, organizations, consultants
> and designers and anyone who would hire a
> permaculture professional simply could require that they have proven
> expertise, knowledge and a certificate(s) of having
> completed training and fieldwork before being hired. This phoo could help
> those professionals in training by offering a
> set of permaculture standards, similar to the Organic Rule for USDA
> certified organic farms and an outline and
> description of standard coursework that should be required of anyone
> seeking status as a certified permaculture
> professional. This process could be elevated to community college and
> university level coursework.
>
> Do read my suggestion about the need to recognize and help those who cannot
> afford any training but want to play a
> significant role in their communities as permaculture mentors, teachers,
> activists (political too, if necessary),
> consultants, designers and local practitioners within a growing community
> of like-minded individuals (this would be so
> important to so many, just think about that if you're thinking about ways
> to make waves for forge the future).
>
> > I was catching up on a stack of New Yorker magazines this morning, and in
> > the Oct 4 issue there's an article that
> > fits right in to this conversation, "Small Change" by Malcolm Gladwell.
> > Gladwell is known for his book "The Tipping
> > Point" and in general being a whole systems thinker. He's made the points
> > I would have liked to have made. I was
> > intrigued that he feels network tools aren't good for doing design, and
> > that they are better at preserving the status
> > quo than changing it. So here's a quote from the article.
> >
> > "Unlike hierarchies, with their rules and procedures, networks aren’t
> > controlled by a single central authority.
> > Decisions are made through consensus, and the ties that bind people to
> > the group are loose. This structure makes
> > networks enormously resilient and adaptable in low-risk situations.
> > Wikipedia is a perfect example. . . .
>
> >
> > "The drawbacks of networks scarcely matter if the network isn’t
> > interested in systemic change—if it just wants to
> > frighten or humiliate or make a splash—or if it doesn’t need to think
> > strategically. But if you’re taking on a
> > powerful and organized establishment you have to be a hierarchy . . . .
>
> Wonderful thinking!
>
> LL
> _______________________________________________
> permaculture mailing list
> permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
> Subscribe, unsubscribe, change your user configuration here:
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/permaculture
> Read the public message archives here:
> https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/permaculture
> Command to put in your browser's Google search box to search these archives:
> site:lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/permaculture [search string (omit the
> brackets)]
> List Usage & Guidelines:
> http://ibiblio.org/permaculture/documents/permaculturelistguide.faq
> Permaculture http://www.ibiblio.org/permaculture
> Permaculture Mailing List Blog
> http://permaculturelist.blogspot.com
> permaculture forums http://www.permies.com/permaculture-forums
> List contact: permacultureforum@gmail.com
-
Re: [permaculture] hierarchies and networks,
Cory Brennan, 11/01/2010
- Re: [permaculture] hierarchies and networks, jamesdavid Sneed, 11/01/2010
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [permaculture] hierarchies and networks,
Holger Hieronimi, 11/01/2010
- Re: [permaculture] hierarchies and networks, jamesdavid Sneed, 11/01/2010
-
Message not available
- Re: [permaculture] hierarchies and networks, jamesdavid Sneed, 11/01/2010
- Re: [permaculture] hierarchies and networks, jamesdavid Sneed, 11/01/2010
- Re: [permaculture] hierarchies and networks, jamesdavid Sneed, 11/01/2010
- Re: [permaculture] hierarchies and networks, jamesdavid Sneed, 11/01/2010
- Re: [permaculture] hierarchies and networks, Mark on Gmail, 11/01/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.