Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

permaculture - Re: [permaculture] The Loss of Our Trees

permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: permaculture

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Mark <mpludwig@facstaff.wisc.edu>
  • To: permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [permaculture] The Loss of Our Trees
  • Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 10:33:18 -0500

At 07:40 AM 8/2/02 -0500, you wrote:
Hi Mark,

>> I find this post, while interesting, peripheral to the current tension
between those who would manage for grass and those who would manage for
trees. <<

When one considers that grassland ecologists and ranchers often take
historical accounts out of context (e.g. looking back only 100 years rather
than say 200 years) in order to justify clearing the woods and torching the
land I don't see how clearing up this historical misunderstanding is
peripheral.

I guess I can agree that history is misused for many political purposes and leave it at that.

>> Obviously they both have value, but a strong case can be made in
grazing situations to keep trees very limited. <<

As well, a strong case can be made to use trees extensively in a grazing
system. There are farmers' trees, mostly legumes such as acacia, locust and
mesquite, which offer a dappled shade and sugar rich seed pods throughout
the summer. This source of sugar and protein (via the seed pods) is
essential for digestion late in the summer when most grasses are nothing but
dried up cellulose and livestock need the extra sugar for fermentation in
their ruminant gut. The dappled shade allows grass production right up to
the trunk of the tree.

I have yet to see the honey locust thing really work yet, though I think it's got potential. My guess is were going to find turkeys or maybe a mix of large grazers to chew the pods and birds to pick through the manure for the seeds will utilize it best. The seeds are so damn hard I think birds or mills will have to grind them. Maybe in TX the fall grass is poor. Not the case in the cooler upper midwest where the c3 grasses put on a push of fall growth and quality. High summer tends to be our slump, c4 grasses may fill that niche best.

Thirty farmers' trees per acre is quite conventional in many countries where
chemical fertilizers and round bailing aren't available. This ratio of
trees per acre is just enough to ensure a return of minerals, nitrogen and
other essential nutrients and enzymes to the upper levels of the soil.

And it gets spread better than manure that is deposited in patches. I really like the locust's and acacia's tiny leaves for this reason

Wooded hill tops are also essential for shading livestock, and giving them a
breezy place where the bighting insects are not so thick. Shaded hill tops
are also key birthing sites.

Very true. Places like this are essential for livestock farms.

>> Trees tend to attract animals into the shade in the hot parts of the
day, limiting their grazing time and concentrating manure, often killing the
trees. <<

Sounds like this scenario would make a tree cutting aggie happy. "We don't
have to worry about kill'n them trees, 'cause the cattle'l do it for us."
Oh right, but then the dead limbs will get caught in the throat of the
bailer. But I see that your point is that you would rather provide no shade
for livestock in order to force them further out into their pastures.

bingo. Most of the farm probably should be pretty open. Waterlines really help with the heat issues, as does good genetic stock; Jerseys and Zebu cross are excellent.

Why
not use reverse psychology on the poor beasts and lure them to other parts
of the paddock with other mottes of trees? Ah, once again, though, we're
managing the landscape in order to accommodate machinery and economics and
it would be difficult to have to steer around a motte of trees.

Rows are OK. As I have said to others, there sometimes is no good substitute for a large piece of roaring iron to get the job dome.

>> When we try to influence the way this land is treated the economics have
to work. <<

Right, and in Texas, I would venture to say that many, many ranchers east
and south of the central US plains and north of the coastal plains are
mainly hobby ranchers allowing their livestock to lackadaisically graze (an
Alan Savory term) primarily in order to obtain their 1-d-1 Ag tax exemption.
Fortunately, the state has a new 1-d-1 Wildlife tax exemption that finally
gives folks more options than hay and livestock production, so maybe we can
start to get away from managing the land simply from an economics approach.


Kirby Fry

I'd call it a toss up around here for what works better, well managed cattle grazing, burn happy prairie fetishists, gun toteing quality deer management Joe bobs or tree farmers. They all have the place in my book.



Mark P. Ludwig
Poultry Research Lab
University of Wisconsin -Madison
608-262-1730 WK
608-846-7125 HM





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page