nafex@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: North American Fruit Explorers mailing list at ibiblio
List archive
- From: Mauch1@aol.com
- To: nafex@lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [NAFEX] Edwardo wrote :)
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:56:05 -0500
But why are Sweet16, Keepsake, and Pixie Crunch only suitable for home use?
And why is Goldrush a maybe for home use?
What makes the others superior for commercial purposes?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Thanks,
Chris Mauchline
SE PA, zone 6
>Answer-------------"To eat 'em"!!!
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "fuwa fuwa usagi" <fuwafuwausagi@muchomail.com>
>To: <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>
>Sent: Saturday, October 26, 2002 11:31 PM
>Subject: [NAFEX] Edwardo wrote :)
> The ever efflorescent Ed wrote:
>
> For home use, you should consider Sweet 16, Keepsake, Suncrisp, =
> Honeycrisp, GoldRush (maybe), Sansa, Sundance and Pixie Crunch. Of =
> those Suncrisp, Sansa, Honeycrisp, Sundance and GoldRush may be grown =
> for commercial purpose.
>
> My reply:
>
> Hold on now Ed, for those of use "orchardly impaired", why did you make
these choices? I know you had your reasons, and darn it, I want that
little bit of knowledge too.
>
> Your fluffy friend, student, and all around buddy...
-
[NAFEX] Edwardo wrote :),
Mauch1, 10/29/2002
-
Re: [NAFEX] Edwardo wrote :),
jeff, 10/29/2002
- Re: [NAFEX] Edwardo wrote :), Thomas Olenio, 10/29/2002
- Re: [NAFEX] Edwardo wrote :), Ed Fackler, 10/29/2002
-
Re: [NAFEX] Edwardo wrote :),
jeff, 10/29/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.