livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing
List archive
Re: [Livingontheland] TWO AGRICULTURES, NOT ONE, By John Michael Greer
- From: "Tradingpost" <tradingpost@lobo.net>
- To: livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [Livingontheland] TWO AGRICULTURES, NOT ONE, By John Michael Greer
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 23:05:56 -0600
Fair question, IMHO. But they say getting the question right is 90% of the
answer ...
paul tradingpost@lobo.net
All of the debts for societys century-long industrial fiesta are coming
due at the same time. We have no choice but to transition to a world no
longer dependent on fossil fuels, a world made up of communities and
economies that function within ecological bounds. How we manage this
transition is the most important question of our time.
-- Richard Heinberg
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 9/30/2010 at 5:40 PM Mike wrote:
>I absolutely agree. We do the same here. I was more making the point
>about harvesting organic matter, that was grown specially for the
>purpose, as a growing system.
>
>As for the shovel or hoe? What a different world we would live in if the
>non-renewable resources had been used to create a renewable
>(sustainable) world. If our oil had been used to create shovels or other
>technology that could thereafter be used with the energy from the field.
>Instead we used our oil and steel to create a world that consumes oil.
>
>So back to the waste organic matter. It is here and now. But we have
>pretty much agreed that it is not going to be available forever. The
>question is, then, how can we use this non-forever resource to create a
>forever system. We absolute must use it. Otherwise it is like letting
>the oil gush into the sea. And in all probability, just as polluting.
>
>I don't have an answer, just the question.
>
>Mike
>
>Tradingpost wrote:
>> Sustainability is not the only consideration. I strongly urge recycling
>whatever organic waste we can use for growing. The fact that it may not be
>around at some time in the future is beside the point. It's here now and
>we can make good use of it or do less without it.
>>
>> You can take that argument to its logical conclusion and figure that if
>the resources to make the tiller or shovel or hoe didn't come from the
>selfsame plot then it's not sustainable.
>>
>> paul tradingpost@lobo.net
-
Re: [Livingontheland] TWO AGRICULTURES, NOT ONE, By John Michael Greer
, (continued)
- Re: [Livingontheland] TWO AGRICULTURES, NOT ONE, By John Michael Greer, paul, 09/26/2010
-
Re: [Livingontheland] TWO AGRICULTURES, NOT ONE, By John Michael Greer,
Mike, 09/25/2010
-
Re: [Livingontheland] TWO AGRICULTURES, NOT ONE, By John Michael Greer,
Tradingpost, 09/27/2010
-
Re: [Livingontheland] TWO AGRICULTURES, NOT ONE, By John Michael Greer,
Dieter Brand, 09/27/2010
- [Livingontheland] bucket drip irrigation, Ken Hargesheimer, 09/27/2010
- Re: [Livingontheland] bucket drip irrigation, Kate Spinner, 09/27/2010
- Re: [Livingontheland] bucket drip irrigation, EJ, 09/28/2010
- Re: [Livingontheland] bucket drip irrigation, Ken Hargesheimer, 09/28/2010
-
Re: [Livingontheland] TWO AGRICULTURES, NOT ONE, By John Michael Greer,
Dieter Brand, 09/27/2010
-
Re: [Livingontheland] TWO AGRICULTURES, NOT ONE, By John Michael Greer,
Tradingpost, 09/27/2010
- Re: [Livingontheland] TWO AGRICULTURES, NOT ONE, By John Michael Greer, pbunch, 09/27/2010
-
Re: [Livingontheland] TWO AGRICULTURES, NOT ONE, By John Michael Greer,
Mike, 09/30/2010
- Re: [Livingontheland] TWO AGRICULTURES, NOT ONE, By John Michael Greer, Tradingpost, 09/30/2010
- Re: [Livingontheland] TWO AGRICULTURES, NOT ONE, By John Michael Greer, pbunch, 09/30/2010
- Re: [Livingontheland] TWO AGRICULTURES, NOT ONE, By John Michael Greer, paul, 09/30/2010
- Re: [Livingontheland] TWO AGRICULTURES, NOT ONE, By John Michael Greer, Harvey Ussery, 09/30/2010
- Re: [Livingontheland] TWO AGRICULTURES, NOT ONE, By John Michael Greer, pbunch, 09/30/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.