Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

livingontheland - Re: [Livingontheland] TWO AGRICULTURES, NOT ONE, By John Michael Greer

livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Harvey Ussery <harvey@themodernhomestead.us>
  • To: livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [Livingontheland] TWO AGRICULTURES, NOT ONE, By John Michael Greer
  • Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:55:06 -0400

On 09/30/2010 07:13 AM, paul@oneseedling.com wrote:
Once nutrients leave the farm they must be replaced from other sources. ~paul@oneseedling

As has said been earlier in the thread, by no means entirely true. Three sources of *renewable* nutrients on-site come to mind:
* Deeply rooted crops (alfalfa, comfrey, others) that "mine" mineral fertility from the depths far below the reach of more shallow rooted crops.
** Legumes set nitrogen, a major nutrient need, in the soil without purchased inputs from elsewhere.
*** And most important of all, sunlight is constantly being added to the equation. While sunlight doesn't create mineral content that's not there (other than N), the more stuff it's helping to grow on the site, the more fertile it's going to become overall.

And we shouldn't think of fertility as solely chemical "nutrients" you can test for in a lab. Fertility is also about how "alive" the soil is. So incorporating livestock on most sites should bring a net gain in fertility--their manure over time boosts soil microbial populations, boosting fertility above and beyond the lab-analysis level of chemicals.

Finally, whether or not some minerals are *available* has a lot to do with the soil food web community. Boost those guys and there is more *usable* mineral content even if we haven't shipped in amendments from elsewhere.

~Harvey

--
Harvey in northern Va
www.themodernhomestead.us

My book, THE MODERN HOMESTEAD POULTRY FLOCK, will be published next year by
Chelsea Green Publishing.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page