internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462
- From: Mark Turner <markt AT siteseers.net>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462
- Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 15:57:23 -0400
Good advice, Roger. The thing is, the amount of money is a little over $800, cheaper than a lawyer. It's the principle, though, damn it! Maybe I'm being hard-headed about this but I don't think I should pay a bill I don't owe.
That said, can anyone recommend a lawyer familiar with these cases?
Thanks,
Mark
Roger Austin wrote:
Mark Turner wrote:
In the past, I worked as a computer consultant. One of the things I did was install Asterisk servers for some local companies. One of those companies has since gone out of business and owes AT&T money. AT&T is now coming after me for the bill the former company owes, thinking that somehow I am responsible for this money. The collection agency somehow obtained my social security number in spite of my never providing it to the defunct company, nor AT&T in relation to the work I did for this defunct company. The only way I can guess my social security number was obtained was by AT&T itself, as I am a Bellsouth residential customer of theirs.
I would see a lawyer as soon as possible to see if you really
are responsible. We don't know what you signed or how you
interacted with AT&T while you were a consultant. Obviously, AT&T
associates you with the defunct company.
I don't think it is hard for investigators to get your personal
info if they want it.
-
Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462
, (continued)
-
Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462,
Cheryl Smith, 08/16/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462,
Mark Turner, 08/16/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462,
Simon Spero, 08/19/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462, Shea Tisdale, 08/19/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462, Steven Champeon, 08/19/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462, Shea Tisdale, 08/19/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462, Steven Champeon, 08/19/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462, Steven Champeon, 08/20/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462, Andrew C. Oliver, 08/22/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462,
Simon Spero, 08/19/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462,
Mark Turner, 08/16/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462,
Cheryl Smith, 08/16/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462,
Mark Turner, 08/08/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] AT&T is evil, reason number 53462, Andrew C. Oliver, 08/09/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.