Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

["Andrew C. Oliver" <acoliver AT buni.org>]

The most important thing isn't the technology it is whether they 
properly up-render it to
non-interlaced resolutions.  If they do not...it will look crappy.  Of 
course...I have a fat ass 60" sony KDS...everything looks good.  Granted 
HD looks best.

Michael Williams wrote:
> Potentially off-topic, but at least tangential:  how well (or poorly)
> do LCD TVs do at displaying standard def?  I've read that they do
> "worse than plasma," but don't have a referent for that and every
> big-box appliance store with LCD TVs on display seems to be running HD
> content to them (or, at least, I suspect it's HD).  The only place I
> could find an LCD HDTV displaying the same in-store demo video as was
> running on the standard tube TVs was Target, where I was surprised to
> see how good what I assume to have been standard def content looked on
> the LCDs if that's supposed to be poor quality.  Is the issue that I
> don't understand what I was looking at (very likely) or that when
> people say that LCDs don't do as good a job as plasma of displaying
> standard-def sources they mean on a very relative, narrow scale?
>
>