internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics
- From: Michael Czeiszperger <michael AT czeiszperger.org>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 11:28:09 -0500
On Dec 12, 2006, at 11:13 AM, Cristobal Palmer wrote:
gmail tagged this as spam. I wouldn't have noticed the email if
somebody else hadn't mentioned it.
Take that however you like.
Speaking of having things you want to read tagged as spam, from a business perspective the spam problem is making it practically impossible for me to communicate with customers via email. Its hugely annoying to have to follow up every email with a phone call, but the stats I just looked at this morning show that just about 10% of the email I send out actually arrives, so then I'm forced to either write a letter or call on the phone. Wat the &@(#&# is holding up a solution to this?
________________________________________________________________________ _________
If you put up a large switch in a cave somewhere, with a sign on it saying "End-
of-the-World Switch. PLEASE DO NOT TOUCH", the paint wouldn't even have time
to dry. -- Pratchett
-- michael at czeiszperger dot org, Chapel Hill, NC
-
[internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics,
Tony Spencer, 12/11/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics,
Cristobal Palmer, 12/12/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics, Tony Spencer, 12/12/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics,
Michael Czeiszperger, 12/12/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics, Cristobal Palmer, 12/12/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics,
Tony Spencer, 12/12/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics, Jason Tower, 12/12/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics,
Steven Champeon, 12/12/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics,
Michael Czeiszperger, 12/12/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics,
Steven Champeon, 12/12/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics,
Michael Czeiszperger, 12/12/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics, Steven Champeon, 12/12/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics, Steven Champeon, 12/12/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics, Michael Czeiszperger, 12/13/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics,
Michael Czeiszperger, 12/12/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics,
Steven Champeon, 12/12/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics,
Michael Czeiszperger, 12/12/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics,
Cristobal Palmer, 12/12/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.