internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] Bush Support Among Repulibcans (was Re: funny bumpersticker)
- From: "Cristobal Palmer" <cristobalpalmer AT gmail.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Bush Support Among Repulibcans (was Re: funny bumpersticker)
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:25:23 -0400
if anyone knows of a tracking poll that records Bush support broken down
by party please let me know.
Joke all you want:
"One of the more amazing results, though much in line with other
surveys, is that almost one in three still say that Saddam Hussein
'was personally involved' in the 9/11 terrorist attacks on the U.S.
Two other national polls in recent weeks found much the same, or even
a higher number, with upwards of two in three ***Republicans***
holding this view [my emphasis]."
From Editor and Publisher,http://www.mediainfo.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003156081
Seriously though, I can understand why some Republicans would refuse
to face the facts. I'm talking here about the Republicans who /don't/
support Bush refusing to face the fact that most do. It's obviously
because they don't want to be associated with stupid people, and how
stupid do you have to be to /STILL/ think that Saddam had anything to
do with September 11th? Now, I realize that there are a fair number of
Bush supporters who don't think that Saddam was involved, but what fun
is that? I'd rather talk about the stupid ones, or maybe the nervously
self-defensive thread-hijacking ones. :)
-CMP
P.S.
69% approve of the war in his own party? That joke writes itself.
--
Cristobal M. Palmer
UNC-CH SILS Student -- ils.unc.edu/~cmpalmer
TriLUG Vice Chair
"There are many roads to enlightenment, and thus many roads back to
the One True Debian" --crimsun
-
Re: [internetworkers] not about bumperstickers
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] not about bumperstickers, Thomas Beckett, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] funny bumpersticker, Thomas Beckett, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] funny bumpersticker, B Holroyd, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] funny bumpersticker, Cristobal Palmer, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] funny bumpersticker, B Holroyd, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] funny bumpersticker, Roger Austin, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] funny bumpersticker, Tanner Lovelace, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] funny bumpersticker, Tony Spencer, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] funny bumpersticker, Tony Spencer, 09/21/2006
- [internetworkers] Bush Support Among Repulibcans (was Re: funny bumpersticker), Michael Czeiszperger, 09/25/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Bush Support Among Repulibcans (was Re: funny bumpersticker), Cristobal Palmer, 09/25/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] Bush Support Among Repulibcans (was Re: funny bumpersticker), Tony Spencer, 09/25/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] also not about bumperstickers, Tony Spencer, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] funny bumpersticker, Greg Brown, 09/21/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] funny bumpersticker,
Greg Brown, 09/21/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] funny bumpersticker,
Thomas Beckett, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] funny bumpersticker, John Broome, 09/21/2006
-
Re: [internetworkers] funny bumpersticker,
Thomas Beckett, 09/21/2006
- Re: [internetworkers] funny bumpersticker, burnett, 09/21/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.