internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others)
- From: Evan Zimmerman <evan.zimmerman AT gmail.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others)
- Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 11:10:38 -0400
Bulge-gate? ;-)
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/10/08/bulge/index_np.html
Perhaps he's just a bit reptilian. That would explain it. I still
can't believe they would be so stupid as to have him cheat like that.
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 11:01:59 -0400, Shea Tisdale <shea AT sheatisdale.com> wrote:
> I've been reading around the net this morning and there are some reports
> that the SS was inspecting members of the press looking for rf gear and
> asking what frequency their equipment was working on. Of course, none of
> this is from a major media source, so take it with a big grain of salt.
>
> Someone needs to analyze the still photos and look at both of his ears to
> see if an earpiece can be seen. The resolution would be much greater than
> the crappy video and maybe this could resolved.
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org [mailto:internetworkers-
> > bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Michael Czeiszperger
> > Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 10:42 AM
> > To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/; Ian Meyer
> > Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others)
> >
> >
> > On Oct 8, 2004, at 10:34 AM, Ian Meyer wrote:
> >
> > > i bet they will
> >
> > What are the chances of someone smuggling radio equipment capable of
> > receiving the transmissions into the hall? My guess is the SS would
> > confiscate anything like that from the audience, so its up to the
> > press, assuming they already have lots of equipment.
> >
> > ___________________________________________________________________
> > michael at czeiszperger dot org
> > Chapel Hill, NC
> >
> > ---
> > Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> > http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> > You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> > To unsubscribe visit
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
>
>
>
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
>
--
Evan
_________________________
evan.zimmerman AT gmail.com
http://evanz.org
-
Re: [internetworkers] Editorial vs. News as it applies to Fox News
, (continued)
-
Re: [internetworkers] Editorial vs. News as it applies to Fox News,
James Dasher, 10/07/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Editorial vs. News as it applies to Fox News,
Jim Allman, 10/07/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Editorial vs. News as it applies to Fox News,
James Dasher, 10/08/2004
-
[internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others),
Paul Jones, 10/08/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others),
Michael Czeiszperger, 10/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others), Evan Zimmerman, 10/08/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others), Shea Tisdale, 10/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others), Ian Meyer, 10/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others), Michael Czeiszperger, 10/08/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others), Shea Tisdale, 10/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others), Evan Zimmerman, 10/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others), Michael Czeiszperger, 10/08/2004
- [internetworkers] Re: Bush wired, Alan MacHett, 10/08/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others), Tony Spencer, 10/08/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others), zman, 10/08/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others), Shea Tisdale, 10/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others), Evan Zimmerman, 10/08/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others), Shea Tisdale, 10/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others), Rowland Smith, 10/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others), Michael, 10/08/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others), Shea Tisdale, 10/09/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others),
Michael Czeiszperger, 10/08/2004
-
[internetworkers] Bush's bulge bothers bloggers (and others),
Paul Jones, 10/08/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Editorial vs. News as it applies to Fox News,
James Dasher, 10/08/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Editorial vs. News as it applies to Fox News,
Jim Allman, 10/07/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Editorial vs. News as it applies to Fox News,
James Dasher, 10/07/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.