Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

[Scott Lundgren <s_l AT mindspring.com>]

I understand this argument but I don't think it holds up because it ignores 
the invisible hand of competitive pressure. Why should a company select one 
sweatshop over another? Because one sweatshop can market its expertise in 
being able to suggest product enhancements, design changes to less the cost 
of production, or the use of advanced manufacturing techniques. Yes, i know 
such an entity would no longer be a sweatshop by implied definiton but such 
an outsource provider can charge a premium.

- SL

> project? Why should a sweatshop even bother to suggest 
> product enhancements or the creation of new, more efficient 
> or more advanced technologies within the applications they 
> are banging out? Churn and burn. IT and business innovation