internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists)
- From: Tanner Lovelace <lovelace AT wayfarer.org>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists)
- Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 12:23:32 -0500
Jim Ray said the following on 3/8/04 11:15 AM:
Why, you may ask? Because if you "reply" to
a message, those of us with threaded e-mail readers then see your
new e-mail listed under a previous thread
[Jim Ray sez:] try Microsoft Outlook, and you might have better results :-)
You mean, I might be infected with every single virus out there?
No thanks. I wouldn't try outlook if you paid me to. I'll
stick with a real mail program.
Tanner
--
Tanner Lovelace | Don't move! Or I'll fill ya full of... little
lovelace AT wayfarer.org | yellow bolts of light! - Commander John Crichton
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Steven Champeon, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Jeremy Portzer, 03/08/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Tony Spencer, 03/08/2004
- [internetworkers] HTML artists, Tony Spencer, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists, Chris Grindstaff, 03/08/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] HTML artists, Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
- Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Tanner Lovelace, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Tony Spencer, 03/08/2004
- Re: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Tanner Lovelace, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
- Re: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Tanner Lovelace, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), zman, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Bill Geschwind, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), zman, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), zman, 03/08/2004
- [internetworkers] old music (was email replies), Thomas Beckett, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] old music (was email replies), zman, 03/08/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.