internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists)
- From: Tanner Lovelace <lovelace AT wayfarer.org>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists)
- Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 11:02:41 -0500
Tony Spencer said the following on 3/8/04 10:20 AM:
I'm in need of a web designer for some contract work. I prefer someone
local with an established portfolio. Thanks much in advance if anyone has
any recommendations.
A quick request to everyone on the list. If you're writing the list
with something new, that is, not replying to an ongoing thread, can you
please don't just pick an e-mail to "reply" to but rather create a
brand new message. Why, you may ask? Because if you "reply" to
a message, those of us with threaded e-mail readers then see your
new e-mail listed under a previous thread. For instance, this message,
in my mail program, is stashed 7 or 8 levels deep under the "fury over
the WTC ads" thread. It's annoying and it's easy to avoid. So, please,
if you're starting a new thread, do *not* reply to an old one.
Thanks,
Tanner Lovelace
--
Tanner Lovelace | Don't move! Or I'll fill ya full of... little
lovelace AT wayfarer.org | yellow bolts of light! - Commander John Crichton
-
RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads
, (continued)
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Shea Tisdale, 03/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
James Dasher, 03/07/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Don Rua, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Jim Allman, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Steven Champeon, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Jeremy Portzer, 03/08/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Tony Spencer, 03/08/2004
- [internetworkers] HTML artists, Tony Spencer, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists, Chris Grindstaff, 03/08/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] HTML artists, Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
- Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Tanner Lovelace, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Tony Spencer, 03/08/2004
- Re: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Tanner Lovelace, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
- Re: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Tanner Lovelace, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), zman, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Bill Geschwind, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), zman, 03/08/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Don Rua, 03/08/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.