internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists)
- From: "Tony Spencer" <tony AT tonyspencer.com>
- To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists)
- Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 11:09:10 -0500
Sorry about that Tanner. I didn't realize that would happen.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
> [mailto:internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf
> Of Tanner Lovelace
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 11:03 AM
> To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> Subject: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists)
>
> Tony Spencer said the following on 3/8/04 10:20 AM:
>
> > I'm in need of a web designer for some contract work. I prefer
> > someone local with an established portfolio. Thanks much
> in advance
> > if anyone has any recommendations.
>
> A quick request to everyone on the list. If you're writing
> the list with something new, that is, not replying to an
> ongoing thread, can you please don't just pick an e-mail to
> "reply" to but rather create a brand new message. Why, you
> may ask? Because if you "reply" to a message, those of us
> with threaded e-mail readers then see your new e-mail listed
> under a previous thread. For instance, this message, in my
> mail program, is stashed 7 or 8 levels deep under the "fury
> over the WTC ads" thread. It's annoying and it's easy to
> avoid. So, please, if you're starting a new thread, do *not*
> reply to an old one.
>
> Thanks,
> Tanner Lovelace
> --
> Tanner Lovelace | Don't move! Or I'll fill ya full of... little
> lovelace AT wayfarer.org | yellow bolts of light! - Commander
> John Crichton
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
>
>
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads
, (continued)
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
James Dasher, 03/07/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Don Rua, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Jim Allman, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Steven Champeon, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Jeremy Portzer, 03/08/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Tony Spencer, 03/08/2004
- [internetworkers] HTML artists, Tony Spencer, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists, Chris Grindstaff, 03/08/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] HTML artists, Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
- Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Tanner Lovelace, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Tony Spencer, 03/08/2004
- Re: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Tanner Lovelace, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
- Re: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Tanner Lovelace, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), zman, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Bill Geschwind, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), zman, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Don Rua, 03/08/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
James Dasher, 03/07/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.