internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists)
- From: "Bill Geschwind" <geschwin AT email.unc.edu>
- To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists)
- Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:05:53 -0500
...just like the ultimate protection against STDs is not having sex?
Would that keep you from having sex?
- Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of zman
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 2:01 PM
To: jim AT neuse.net; Internetworkers:
http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
Subject: RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML
artists)
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Jim Ray wrote:
> The trick is proper protection.
But the ultimate protection is not using Windows...
--
Scott H. Zekanis
zman AT kungfumonkey.com
http://www.rod-o-rama.com
http://www.thehellbenders.com
1957 Buick Riviera Hardtop (2 dr., 364" Nailhead)
1959 GMC in Chevy Sheetmetal 1/2 Ton (235" Inline 6)
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
-
Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists, Chris Grindstaff, 03/08/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] HTML artists, Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
- Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Tanner Lovelace, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Tony Spencer, 03/08/2004
- Re: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Tanner Lovelace, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
- Re: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Tanner Lovelace, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), zman, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Bill Geschwind, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), zman, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), Jim Ray, 03/08/2004
- RE: Replying to e-mails (was Re: [internetworkers] HTML artists), zman, 03/08/2004
- [internetworkers] old music (was email replies), Thomas Beckett, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] old music (was email replies), zman, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] old music (was email replies), Sil Greene, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] old music (was email replies), zman, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] old music (was email replies), Sil Greene, 03/08/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] old music (was email replies), zman, 03/08/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.