Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - Re: [internetworkers] Today's Supreme Court Ruling

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Steven Champeon <schampeo AT hesketh.com>
  • To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Today's Supreme Court Ruling
  • Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:55:17 -0500

on Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 05:41:48PM -0500, Lee Haslup wrote:
> It is embarrassing to admit that I had altogether forgotten the
> overarching public need to prevent "rituals". You won't rat me out,
> will you?

Go read the Constitution - the overarching public need is to prevent the
State from involving itself in the funding, support, and favor of one
religion over another - hence, funding a ritual in the name of food
stamps is an interference in religion by the State.

I'm sorry your examples weren't more cogent or sturdy. But no, I won't
rat you out. No need, really.

--
hesketh.com/inc. v: (919) 834-2552 f: (919) 834-2554 w: http://hesketh.com
Book publishing is second only to furniture delivery in slowness. -b. schneier




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page