internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Shea Tisdale" <shea AT sheatisdale.com>
- To: "internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] 20:02, 11-11, 2002
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 12:50:51 -0500
Or I could sell you a watch, I mean Swatch, that has it as a constant
display...
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 12:58:17 -0500 (EST), burnett AT pobox.com wrote:
>On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Shea Tisdale wrote:
>
>> Swatch put out watches using swatch beats which broke days up into 1000
>> even increments. The hallmark of their now defunct system was no
>> timezones and saying time in the format of @489. For the digital age it
>> actually made alot of sense
>> since a conference call @715 would be at 715swatchbeats anywhere on earth.
>> So no timezones translations, etc.
>>
>> But alas, our old movement of the planets based time system is just to
>> popular...
>
>If you're using a Mac, add it to your desktop:
>
>OS X menu bar
>http://www.versiontracker.com/moreinfo.fcgi?id=4889
>OS X Dock
>http://www.versiontracker.com/moreinfo.fcgi?id=10839
>OS9 (controlstrip module):
>http://www.versiontracker.com/moreinfo.fcgi?id=4331
>
>Steve
>--
>Steve Burnett burnett AT pobox.com http://www.pobox.com/~burnett/
>System Administration Technical Documentation Information Retrieval
>
>
>---
>Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
>http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
>You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
>To unsubscribe visit
>http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
-
[internetworkers] 20:02, 11-11, 2002,
Michael D. Thomas, 11/11/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] 20:02, 11-11, 2002,
Thomas Beckett, 11/11/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] 20:02, 11-11, 2002,
Chris Hedemark, 11/11/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] 20:02, 11-11, 2002, Victor Minton, 11/11/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] 20:02, 11-11, 2002, craig duncan, 11/12/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] 20:02, 11-11, 2002, Steven Champeon, 11/11/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] 20:02, 11-11, 2002,
Michael D. Thomas, 11/12/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] 20:02, 11-11, 2002, Thomas Beckett, 11/12/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] 20:02, 11-11, 2002,
Shea Tisdale, 11/12/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] 20:02, 11-11, 2002,
burnett, 11/12/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] 20:02, 11-11, 2002, Shea Tisdale, 11/12/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] 20:02, 11-11, 2002,
burnett, 11/12/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] 20:02, 11-11, 2002,
Chris Hedemark, 11/11/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [internetworkers] 20:02, 11-11, 2002,
Michael D. Thomas, 11/12/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] 20:02, 11-11, 2002,
Maria C Winslow, 11/12/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] 20:02, 11-11, 2002, Calvin Powers, 11/14/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] 20:02, 11-11, 2002, Thomas Beckett, 11/12/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] 20:02, 11-11, 2002,
Sil Greene, 11/12/2002
-
[internetworkers] Tuesday Morning Randomness,
Dallas Smith, 11/12/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Tuesday Morning Randomness,
Chris Hedemark, 11/12/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] Tuesday Morning Randomness, Steven Champeon, 11/12/2002
- [internetworkers] Tuesday Morning Randomness - answers, Dallas Smith, 11/12/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] Tuesday Morning Randomness, Shea Tisdale, 11/12/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Tuesday Morning Randomness,
Chris Hedemark, 11/12/2002
-
[internetworkers] Tuesday Morning Randomness,
Dallas Smith, 11/12/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] 20:02, 11-11, 2002,
Maria C Winslow, 11/12/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] 20:02, 11-11, 2002,
Thomas Beckett, 11/11/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.