Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - RE: Telemarketer Bill

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "David R. Matusiak" <matusiak AT speakeasy.net>
  • To: InterNetWorkers <internetworkers AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: RE: Telemarketer Bill
  • Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 07:29:24 -0700 (PDT)


ROGER AUSTIN FOR PRESIDENT!!

you heard it here first!

___ _ _____ . ....
m a h t o o z e e a c k a t s p e e k e e z e e d o t n e t
------ / / ......... . . .

On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Austin, Roger D. wrote:

> The problem is this is that it this is the opposite of what should happen.
> All this should be opt-in rather than opt-out. Also, this is only in North
> Carolina, not nation wide so it is less helpful than it sounds.
>
> > Charitable organizations would not be affected by the restrictions.
>
> These are as abusive as the for-profits IMO. I don't see what the
> difference is between receiving unwanted telephone solicitations from a
> business vs. a non profit organization. Why make this distinction? These
> days, it is a little difficult to tell the difference at times.
>
> A better law would be one that completely bans the use of telephone
> solicitation and spam by anyone at anytime. One step back from that would be
> a law that allows it, but only if people request to be on the opt-in call
> list.





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page