internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: Michael S Czeiszperger <czei AT webperformanceinc.com>
- To: "InterNetWorkers" <internetworkers AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Spam Ilegal on NC
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 13:28:01 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 13 December 2001 01:07 pm, you wrote:
> >The main thing that fuels a class action suit is the ability to punish the
> >perpetrator by getting a monetary award. The people who try to sell viagra
> >through unsolicited email are mostly losers with no money, so there's no
> >financial incentive.
>
> Well at the very least, it might help, or at least feel like you're doing
> something, to send spammers the quoted NC spam law and its location on the
> Web. Doubtful that a lot of them ever read incoming replies, but again,
> it's better than just filtering and complaining.
>
Actually I do more than complain. Spammers most often hide the source and
path of the email making it difficult to complain to the ISP, but Spamcop has
software that figures out where the email came from, and then allows you to
send a detailed complaint email to all parties involved. I'm pretty careful
about who I send this to, since you don't want administrators to start
ignoring SPAM complaints. This often results in the spammer's ISP closing
them down.
I've personally get a registered letter from my ISP every time I send an
email to one of our mailing lists, so I know that at least some ISPs do pay
attention to complaints.
- --
Michael S Czeiszperger
czei AT webperformanceinc.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
iQA/AwUBPBjzMVgOl/a4Fw2AEQIdIwCgnwxbIVmMZbuTAIk97H3zbpfJ+3cAoPmR
XQUoNx+PY/ZlLkqxmwIybQnB
=YhiQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Spam Ilegal on NC,
Josep L. Guallar-Esteve, 12/13/2001
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, Beth Ellison, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, David Matusiak, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, Beth Ellison, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, David Matusiak, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, Michael S Czeiszperger, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, Beth Ellison, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, Craig Duncan, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, Michael S Czeiszperger, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, Michael S Czeiszperger, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, B, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, David Matusiak, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, Michael S Czeiszperger, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, David Matusiak, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, Scott Russell, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, sovenall, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, Joe Komenda, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, Scott Russell, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, B, 12/14/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.