internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Re: Spam Ilegal on NC

From: David Matusiak <matusiak AT speakeasy.net>
To: InterNetWorkers <internetworkers AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Subject: Re: Spam Ilegal on NC
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2001 09:42:50 -0800 (PST)

TaB -- why aren't we "class-action'ing" their asses RIGHT NOW?

> Well since this is NC law:
>
> "Legislation approved in June 1999 makes it illegal to send unsolicited bulk
> commercial e-mail containing falsified routing
> information, if the sender thereby violates a provider's policies. The law
> applies to e-mail sent into or within the state."
>
> What can be done that won't cost a fortune we don't have? ANyone?

Spam Ilegal on NC, Josep L. Guallar-Esteve, 12/13/2001
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, Beth Ellison, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, David Matusiak, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, Beth Ellison, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, David Matusiak, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, Michael S Czeiszperger, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, Beth Ellison, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, Craig Duncan, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, Michael S Czeiszperger, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, Michael S Czeiszperger, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, B, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, David Matusiak, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, Michael S Czeiszperger, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, David Matusiak, 12/13/2001
- Re: Spam Ilegal on NC, Scott Russell, 12/13/2001