homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Homestead mailing list
List archive
Re: [Homestead] Drug screens and the way things should be
- From: Marie McHarry <mmcharry AT gmail.com>
- To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [Homestead] Drug screens and the way things should be
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:28:43 -0500
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:54 PM, EarthNSky <erthnsky AT bellsouth.net> wrote:
> If it is accepted that you and I must be subjected for drug testing in
> order to get our paycheck, why is it not accepted that those who receive
> government assistance in the form of welfare or unemployment be
> subjected to the same random screening and terms?
The simple reason is that private employees have relatively few rights
with respect to their employees. We are protected from our government
by the Constitution and law, but we are not so protected in the
private sector (unless we belong to a union that bargains for
protection, and those protections rarely cover new hires who don't
belong to the union yet).
Marie
-
Re: [Homestead] Drug screens and the way things should be,
Marie McHarry, 10/01/2009
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [Homestead] Drug screens and the way things should be,
Marie McHarry, 10/01/2009
- Re: [Homestead] Drug screens and the way things should be, Lynda, 10/01/2009
-
Re: [Homestead] Drug screens and the way things should be,
Marie McHarry, 10/01/2009
- Re: [Homestead] Drug screens and the way things should be, Lynda, 10/01/2009
- Re: [Homestead] Drug screens and the way things should be, EarthNSky, 10/01/2009
-
Re: [Homestead] Drug screens and the way things should be,
Lynda, 10/01/2009
- Re: [Homestead] Drug screens and the way things should be, EarthNSky, 10/01/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.