Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

homestead - Re: [Homestead] gold back currency anyone?

homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Homestead mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Clansgian AT wmconnect.com
  • To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [Homestead] gold back currency anyone?
  • Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 20:52:44 EST



> >Many would say that your jug of rum has no intrinsic value, unless there
> was someone who desired to get drunk, just as the same person might desire
> a
> gold ring or necklace.
>

Yes, Bob, and I call those people .... hmmmm ...er .... people without a
great deal of critical thinking. Saying rum has no intrinsic value unless
you
plan to get drunk is as idiotic as saying water has no intrinsic value unless
you
want to avoid dehydration. Do they understand what the word 'intrinsic'
means?? To wit:

If you want a bauble, you can go to the creek and find a colorful pebble, a
rock. Your admiration of it is entirely in your head ... entirely. It could
be the gold neclace or a pebble on a string.

But if you want to get drunk, try going to the same creek and drink the
water. Not the same .... eh? It's because there is a property of the rum
that is
different from that of the water, it is characteristic of rum, that is, it is
intrinsic, doesn't depend on outside influences to be true.

Potatoes have intrinsic worth. Try going to that same creek and eating the
rocks. The potatoes will supply calories, protein, and enough vitimin C to
keep away the scurvy in the winter. Does the rock do that? No. So the
potato
has intrinsic worth and the rock does not.

A stack of firewood can raise the temp in my house from freezing to 68
degrees (what it is now). Go to the creek and take up the sod on the bank.
Can it
do the same thing? No. The wood has intrinsic worth that the sod does not.

It shows how utterly detached from reality that someone is when they equate
admiring a gold ring to avoiding starvation. Under the right circumstances
that person would trade a bushel basket of gold rings for a potato. But
would
you, under those same circumstances, trade a bushel basket of cabbages for a
single potato? The difference there spells out the nature of intrinsic worth
vs.
imagined worth.

>> Gold 'has' been used as a medium of currency and as a 'store of wealth'
> for millenia, but you are right that you can not eat the stuff.

And you are not entirely correct that it has been thus used for millenia.
The use of gold comes and goes. I've had this discussion many times before.
There were times in history when gold was just about worthless. In most
cases
in the past, the value of gold was enforced by some government or the other
and
without that it may or may not have any value.

My example of this is that you are familiar with R.L. Stevens story Treasure
Island. There was tons of gold there, but what good did it do anyone on the
island? The goal of both the protagonists and the pirates was to get the
gold
back to England where the government enforced a value system giving the gold
a
monetary worth. Unless you have that enforced system of values, the gold is
worthless as money.

Saying that gold has always been a store of wealth is to say that people have
always harobored the hope that they will be able to hold onto their gold
through evil times until there is a stable monetary system that will enforce
the
gold's value. During bad times the self same similar hope in others is the
only thing that gives gold a trade value.

James






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page