Homestead mailing list

[Johnathan Livingston <legolas9 AT ymail.com>]

Democrats, Republican - same politician mindset.
It was the leaders of BOTH parties that made the deal to split the number of 
votes necessary to pass the bill.  They did this because they were getting 
mail from their constituents that was running up to 300 to 1 against the 
bailout.  They, the leaders of BOTH parties, then instruructed the members 
that are coming up for reelection to vote no.  Those members that are 
retiring this year, those members who are safely in their position this year 
were instructed to vote yes.  These leaders, these representatives of the 
people, were protecting those we the people could vote out in the coming 
election.
Vote them all out Gene, vote them all out.



----- Original Message ----
From: Gene GeRue <genegerue AT ruralize.com>
To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2008 9:26:07 AM
Subject: Re: [Homestead] Bailout bill and politicians


On Oct 1, 2008, at 9:08 PM, Johnathan Livingston wrote:

>  I feel used.  I feel dirty.  I feel I am an American powerless in  
> my own country.
> We have an economy based on usery.  We had a chance to make the  
> correction but we chose to continue with the fraud.  Our children  
> will pay for it.  May our politicians rot in hell.

Please vote against the incumbents.

_______________________________________________
Homestead list and subscription:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead
Change your homestead list member options:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/homestead/legolas9%40ymail.com
View the archives at:
http://lists.ibiblio..org/pipermail/homestead



>From Clansgian AT wmconnect.com  Thu Oct  2 22:43:46 2008
Return-Path: <Clansgian AT wmconnect.com>
X-Original-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix, from userid 3002)
        id 832E44C015; Thu,  2 Oct 2008 22:43:46 -0400 (EDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on malecky
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, 
MIME_QP_LONG_LINE
        autolearn=disabled version=3.2.3
Received: from imo-d20.mx.aol.com (imo-d20.mx.aol.com [205.188.139.136])
        by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A274C024
        for <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Thu,  2 Oct 2008 22:43:45 -0400 
(EDT)
Received: from Clansgian AT wmconnect.com
        by imo-d20.mx.aol.com  (mail_out_v39.1.) id 3.d33.3f586a3a (29678)
        for <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Thu, 2 Oct 2008 22:43:31 -0400 
(EDT)
From: Clansgian AT wmconnect.com
Message-ID: <d33.3f586a3a.3616e0d3 AT wmconnect.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 22:43:31 EDT
To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: 6.0 for Windows XP sub 11501
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.9
Subject: Re: [Homestead] Is it serious, or is it not?
X-BeenThere: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
List-Id: <homestead.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead>,
        <mailto:homestead-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead>
List-Post: <mailto:homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead>,
        <mailto:homestead-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 02:43:46 -0000

In a message dated 10/2/2008 9:17:03 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
genegerue AT ruralize.com writes:


> >Is that a swear word? Deo might allude to a god? Vindice might allude
> to vindication?

Gads!  'Deo Vindice' is the motto of the CSA.  It is usually rendered "God
will vindicate" but 'Deo' is in the dative case so a better rendering would be
'With God (or by God!), it vindicates.  'It' here probably being the CSA 
itself.



>
> >How's that unreconstructed part working out for you? It is my
> understanding that carrying anger within is unhealthy. I would not
> want the list to lose you prematurely.
>

It's working quite well.  The entire War for Southern Independence was
essentially about federalism.  That's why the new country was called a 
confederacy,
that is, a loosely joined group of self-governing states.  The power and
intervention of a strong federal goverment was what was being rejected.  And 
by
extension a philosophy that state and local governments should be endowed by 
the
people with as little right to interfer with their lives as possible.

If you are not a WfSI buff, then you might not be aware that the now days
popular Confederate naval and battle flag (and then for only some units), the
Stars and Bars, was NOT the flag of the CSA.  Rather  the flag was a solid 
blue
background with a single white star.  The real cause was reflected in one of
the most popular songs of the time,  'The Bonnie Blue Flag'

"We are a band of brothers and native to the soil
Fighting for our Liberty, With treasure, blood and toil
And when our rights were threatened, the cry rose near and far
Hurrah for the Bonnie Blue Flag that bears a single star!
....
Hurrah! Hurrah!
For Southern rights, hurrah!
Hurrah for the Bonnie Blue Flag that bears a single star.?


So to answer your question, I stand today unencumbered by the heinous blight
of federalism and government intervention as any man drawing breath.  That's
my status of unreconstructed.

And it's quite relaxing, thank you.  So much so I might live to be 110.


And, oh, ........ Deo Vindice!
   </HTML>