Homestead mailing list

[Bill Jones <billj AT harborside.com>]

Clansgian AT wmconnect.com wrote:

> Higher rates of C02 means the plants absorb it differently and yield more 
> growth.  It's slight, but in time it would sequester the carbon back into the 
> biosphere.   </HTML>
>  
Some of their "global warming" stuff seems insane.  Basically, if God 
were to rain manna down from heaven, as in the Exodus story, that would 
actually be a BAD thing, because it would increase the carbon available 
at the surface, right?  Who decided how much carbon our planet needs on 
its surface?  Isn't it just a total coincidence that much of our 
planet's carbon was moved underground by sinking peat bogs and falling 
trees, just in time to match whatever temperature the sun happens to be 
right now?  And why should either of these events coincide with man's 
arrival here?  IMO we could equally likely be saving the planet from the 
next ice age.  If these boobs can't even tell us why ice ages are 
happening, let's send em back to the drawing board.

As far as the earth charity BS, I've always been taught that anaerobic 
decay products are detrimental to plants.  So even if it could 
"sequester carbon" it would just be something incidental to agriculture, 
if not antithetical, like storing any sort of waste in the garden would be.

Well, the other night i saw a graffiti board at a bar in Hollywood with 
"Clinton '08" scrawled on it.  I locked the door, and carefully changed 
the I to an A, and added the word "ma" to give "MA CLANTON '08".  I hope 
today's the last we hear of that sow.  Who would anyone vote for a 
slimebag liawyeress over a war hero?