Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

homestead - Re: [Homestead] "Non-Native Invasives" Useful in Permaculture (Part I)

homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Homestead mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Bill Jones <billj AT harborside.com>
  • To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [Homestead] "Non-Native Invasives" Useful in Permaculture (Part I)
  • Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:59:24 -0700

Lynda wrote:

You are starting from a false premise. The reason the non-natives are doing so well is Round-Up, Oust, soil disruption, fertilizers, pesticides and so forth and so on.

People go in and plow under the natives because they brought with them the plants they were familiar with. With all that man made help they did well to the detriment of the natives.

I'm really not following why chemicals should affect plants from another region more so than "natives". No one really cares that much exactly which pretty little flowers grow in the ditch, as long as some plant is there to prevent erosion and produce our oxygen. Your attachment to them is purely emotional.

AND, not planting natives just because you are peeved at what you call enviro-whatsits is just plain silly.

Many "natives" are useful to us as well. This is a false conclusion.

Your seed mixes are there because someone is making M-O-N-E-Y. Not because they will do best but because some seed company could make $$.

You want legumes, there are lots of natives, Trifolium macrocephalum, T. wormskioldii, and Vicia americana, just to name a couple or three.

If you try to buy these "native" seeds, you'll pay a whole lot more. BTW, T. macrocephalum is an annual, of no use to me. I need forages that are instantly available the moment the rains begin, not six months later.

So the whole of OSU research into forage crops is all about making someone money? I mean, I'm cynical about everything corporate as well, as you know, but you really should talk to someone who has had experience planting all these crops and understands why they're so useful. For instance, reed canary grass is considered to be about the only option for vigorous forage production on swampy fields, and it's definitely one of the plants banned under the New England states' new laws.

Maybe farmers can be overburdened to the point of being convinced to give up farming altogether, to let the competitors make more money, and return more of the land to nature.

As to permaculture, that would be defined as "an ethic of caring for the earth and interacting with the environment in mutually beneficial ways" and how is that going to end simply because folks learn to use natives and collect their own seeds?

The burden of proof is upon you to show that planting non-natives cannot also fit in with this notion.

Much of Mollison's work focuses on Acacia. That's because you can harvest as much biomass in five minutes from a patch of Acacia as you could in half an hour of clover mowing. There's only one species, or perhaps two, that are reliably hardy here. Out here the temperature will inevitably tumble to -10 C. or lower, and the tops on all Acacia species will be killed. The "invasive" ones are precisely those which sprout again from runners, obviously, for without this ability the crown would just die out.

I discovered this loony attack on our freedoms as a result of researching online the things I read about in Mollison's book. Over and over you'll see Acacia praised by researchers for its ability to produce biomass for African villages, for example, but in the US it's under attack. This discrepancy between the academic and the commercial is what led me to look deeper into the matter, and I found that nearly every cover crop --those commonly used by people with good sense who've actually gardened or farmed-- is under attack as well. Obviously white clover is invasive, and that's what we like about it. I can't help but think, beyond the obvious attempt to kiss the timber companies' arses, and getting the message to illegal aliens that the party is working for the "true natives", that it's just better if Americans are stripped of their ability to compete effectively in as many ways as possible, for the need to have a nation consisting exclusively of dependent, naive consumers is perhaps the most pressing of all.

Monsanto will receive their big gift later from the "natives only" wackos when they demand the removal of all the big-leaf trefoil (L. uliginosus) from the ditch along US 101, and everywhere else.

Bill




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page