homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Homestead mailing list
List archive
[Homestead] Homebuilders nightmare, Big Timber dream
- From: Tvoivozhd <tvoivozd AT infionline.net>
- To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [Homestead] Homebuilders nightmare, Big Timber dream
- Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 18:41:20 -0700
For Bush, turning National Forests over to State thieves isn't enough---has to sweeten the pot for Big Timber by a 27.5 percent import duty on Canadian lumber---adding $2000 to the cost of building each house in the U.S.. Isn't he wonderful, so compassionate it makes want to throw up.
NAFTA Rules Against U.S. Lumber Subsidies
By Leslie Miller
Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON (AP) - For the third time, a North American Free Trade Agreement panel has ruled that the United States failed to prove its softwood lumber industry is harmed by Canadian imports.
In the decision late Tuesday, the five-member NAFTA panel directed the U.S. International Trade Commission to rescind its justification for the average 27.2 percent tariffs on Canadian lumber since May 2002.
The panel said the ITC had presented no new evidence to support earlier rejected evidence that Canadian imports harmed U.S. producers. The commission "is simply unwilling to accept this panel's review authority," the NAFTA panel said.
The National Association of Home Builders applauded the ruling, calling it a victory for American homebuyers squeezed by lumber prices nearing record levels. The home builders group called on the Bush administration not to appeal the ruling.
Softwood lumber from pine, spruce and fir trees is used to build homes. In 2002, the United States imported about a third of its supply - nearly $6 billion - from Canada.
That year, the Bush administration slapped stiff duties on softwood imports from four Canadian provinces.
The Commerce Department in June proposed cutting the duties, which include antidumping and punitive tariffs, to 13.2 percent.
Christopher Padilla, a spokesman for the U.S. Trade Representative, said the administration has concerns about the ruling and has not decided how to proceed.
"It's in the interest of both the United States and Canada to try to reach a permanent solution to the softwood lumber dispute," Padilla said.
---
On the Net:
International Trade Administration: http://www.ita.doc.gov
Canada Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade: www.dfait-maeci.gc.ca/
AP-ES-09-01-04 1722EDT
-
[Homestead] Homebuilders nightmare, Big Timber dream,
Tvoivozhd, 09/01/2004
-
Re: [Homestead] Homebuilders nightmare, Big Timber dream - Not,
Walter H . Jeffries, 09/01/2004
-
Re: [Homestead] Homebuilders nightmare, Big Timber dream - Not,
Lynda, 09/02/2004
-
Re: [Homestead] Homebuilders nightmare, Big Timber dream - Not,
Walter H . Jeffries, 09/02/2004
-
Re: [Homestead] Homebuilders nightmare, Big Timber dream - Not,
Lynda, 09/03/2004
-
Re: [Homestead] Homebuilders nightmare, Big Timber dream - Not,
Walter H . Jeffries, 09/03/2004
-
[Homestead] "Forest" vs timber/lumber,
Toni Hawryluk, 09/03/2004
- Re: [Homestead] "Forest" vs timber/lumber, Walter H . Jeffries, 09/04/2004
- Re: [Homestead] "Forest" vs timber/lumber, Lynda, 09/04/2004
- Re: [Homestead] "Forest" vs timber/lumber, Walter H . Jeffries, 09/04/2004
- [Homestead] Welfare, was "Forest" vs timber/lumber, Lynda, 09/04/2004
-
[Homestead] "Forest" vs timber/lumber,
Toni Hawryluk, 09/03/2004
-
Re: [Homestead] Homebuilders nightmare, Big Timber dream - Not,
Walter H . Jeffries, 09/03/2004
-
Re: [Homestead] Homebuilders nightmare, Big Timber dream - Not,
Lynda, 09/03/2004
-
Re: [Homestead] Homebuilders nightmare, Big Timber dream - Not,
Walter H . Jeffries, 09/02/2004
-
Re: [Homestead] Homebuilders nightmare, Big Timber dream - Not,
Lynda, 09/02/2004
-
Re: [Homestead] Homebuilders nightmare, Big Timber dream - Not,
Walter H . Jeffries, 09/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.