freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: "Lowden, James K" <LowdenJK AT bernstein.com>
- To: "Kall, Bruce A." <kall AT mayo.edu>, "FreeTDS Development Group" <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage
- Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 11:07:21 -0400
> From: Kall, Bruce A.
> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 10:22 AM
>
> Just wondering if the problem described in my previous email is
> fixed in 0.64?
Yes. I rewrote quite a bit of the buffering logic, and extended the
unit tests for it. I assert it works now.
I would be pleased if you would try out any recent nightly snapshot, in
anticipation of the release. If you discover any problems, I would like
to know about them.
--jkl
> >From: Thompson, Bill D (London)
> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 10:34 AM
> >>
> >> Bruce,
> >>
> >
> >>> > Is this true?
> >
> >>
> >> No. Not as far as I know.
>
>
> Au contraire, mon ami. I'm afraid it is.
>
> ISTR buffering has been broken for a while. I just updated
> src/dblib/unittests/t0002.c to demonstrate. If the test is broken,
> please say how.
>
> Right now, dbclrbuf() fails an assertion if there are no rows
> buffered. It shouldn't. But if you move dbclrbuf() after the
> dbnextrow() loop, you just get a different kind of error:
>
> Failed. Expected i to be 11, was 10
>
> Unfortunately, the buffering logic is a bear.
>
> --jkl
-----------------------------------------
The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and
confidential information and is intended only for the use of the person(s)
named
above. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
responsible
for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any review,
dissemination,
distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
you are
not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately by reply
and destroy all copies of the original message. Please note that we do not
accept
account orders and/or instructions by e-mail, and therefore will not be
responsible
for carrying out such orders and/or instructions. If you, as the intended
recipient
of this message, the purpose of which is to inform and update our clients,
prospects
and consultants of developments relating to our services and products, would
not
like to receive further e-mail correspondence from the sender, please "reply"
to the
sender indicating your wishes. In the U.S.: 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New
York,
NY 10105.
-
[freetds] 0.64 status and coverage,
ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 07/07/2005
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, Kall, Bruce A., 07/07/2005
-
Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage,
liam, 07/08/2005
-
Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage,
Frediano Ziglio, 07/08/2005
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, liam, 07/25/2005
-
Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage,
Frediano Ziglio, 07/08/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, Lowden, James K, 07/07/2005
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, Lowden, James K, 07/07/2005
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 07/07/2005
-
Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage,
Lowden, James K, 07/08/2005
-
Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage,
Frediano Ziglio, 07/14/2005
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, Peter Deacon, 07/14/2005
-
Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage,
Frediano Ziglio, 07/14/2005
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 07/15/2005
-
Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage,
ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 07/25/2005
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, liam, 07/25/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.