freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: FreeTDS Development Group

List archive

Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage

From: "ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT" <Frediano.Ziglio AT vodafone.com>
To: "FreeTDS Development Group" <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:00:28 +0200

>
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 06:43:02PM +0200, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
>
> > Feel free to send a patch. I agree to remove volatile and use
> > syncronization function. unittests are mainly internal unit
> tests even
>
> Please find the patch attached. I've slightly changed how the
> unit test
> works as well as I feel this provides more appropriate coverage for a
> multi-threaded unit test.
>
> Cheers.
>

Applied, only small changes made.

Test pass on mssql and sybase
http://freetds.sourceforge.net/out/test/vgtest69.html (mssql2k)
http://freetds.sourceforge.net/out/test2/vgtest69.html (sybase ase
12.5.2)

Why do you boost thread loop count from 100 to 1000 ?

freddy77

Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage , (continued)
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, liam, 07/08/2005
  - Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, Frediano Ziglio, 07/08/2005
    - Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, liam, 07/25/2005
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, Lowden, James K, 07/07/2005
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, Lowden, James K, 07/07/2005
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 07/07/2005
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, Lowden, James K, 07/08/2005
  - Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, Frediano Ziglio, 07/14/2005
    - Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, Peter Deacon, 07/14/2005
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 07/15/2005
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 07/25/2005
  - Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, liam, 07/25/2005