freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: "Kall, Bruce A." <kall AT mayo.edu>
- To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>, bill_d_thompson AT ml.com, Frediano.Ziglio AT vodafone.com
- Subject: Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage
- Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 09:22:18 -0500
Greetings,
Just wondering if the problem described in my previous email is fixed in 0.64?
Thanks,
Bruce
>From: Thompson, Bill D (London)
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 10:34 AM
>>
>> Bruce,
>>
>
>>> > Is this true?
>
>>
>> No. Not as far as I know.
Au contraire, mon ami. I'm afraid it is.
ISTR buffering has been broken for a while. I just updated
src/dblib/unittests/t0002.c to demonstrate. If the test is broken,
please say how.
Right now, dbclrbuf() fails an assertion if there are no rows buffered.
It shouldn't. But if you move dbclrbuf() after the dbnextrow() loop,
you just get a different kind of error:
Failed. Expected i to be 11, was 10
Unfortunately, the buffering logic is a bear.
--jkl
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kall, Bruce A.
>> Sent: 13 April 2005 15:26
>>
>> Is this true?
>>
>
>>> > Apparently FreeTDS has issues with stored procs that return more
than
>> one result set.
>>
>> I appear to be having this problem as a stored procedure returning
more
>> than one result set results in the following error:
>>
>
>>> > dblib.c:303: buffer_add_row: Assertion `row_size <=
buf->element_size'
>> failed.
>>
>> Executing Sybase stored procedures that one return one result set run
>> just fine. I'm running it through php and freetds 0.62. I've tried
>> early versions of 0.63 to no avail.
-
[freetds] 0.64 status and coverage,
ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 07/07/2005
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, Kall, Bruce A., 07/07/2005
-
Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage,
liam, 07/08/2005
-
Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage,
Frediano Ziglio, 07/08/2005
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, liam, 07/25/2005
-
Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage,
Frediano Ziglio, 07/08/2005
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, Lowden, James K, 07/07/2005
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, Lowden, James K, 07/07/2005
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 07/07/2005
-
Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage,
Lowden, James K, 07/08/2005
-
Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage,
Frediano Ziglio, 07/14/2005
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, Peter Deacon, 07/14/2005
-
Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage,
Frediano Ziglio, 07/14/2005
- Re: [freetds] 0.64 status and coverage, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 07/15/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.